Navajo vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Romanians

Poor
Excellent
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,127,550 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Romanians.
Navajo Integration in Romanian Communities

Navajo vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $48,445, a difference of 66.9%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $111,243, a difference of 56.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $108,609, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 25.0%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $41,663, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $53,632, a difference of 26.6%).
Navajo vs Romanian Income
Income MetricNavajoRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Navajo vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.0%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 130.5%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 44.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 59.6%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 61.3%).
Navajo vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Navajo vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 107.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 98.5%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 91.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.5%).
Navajo vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoRomanian
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Navajo vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Navajo vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
83.0%

Navajo vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 79.1%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.1%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Navajo vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.7%

Navajo vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Navajo vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Fair
6.2%

Navajo vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 83.9%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 82.1%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 76.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Navajo vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Navajo vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%).
Navajo vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricNavajoRomanian
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%