Icelander vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Romanians

Good
Excellent
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,644,284 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 208.9 Romanians.
Icelander Integration in Romanian Communities

Icelander vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $60,063, a difference of 8.4%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $48,445, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $102,544, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $53,632, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $64,142, a difference of 4.7%).
Icelander vs Romanian Income
Income MetricIcelanderRomanian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
28.0%

Icelander vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.23%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Icelander vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderRomanian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.4%

Icelander vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Icelander vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Icelander vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
Icelander vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Good
83.0%

Icelander vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.16%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Icelander vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
28.7%

Icelander vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.4%).
Icelander vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Icelander vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.8%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
Icelander vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%

Icelander vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Icelander vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderRomanian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
2.4%