Turkish vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Romanians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,187,398 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 120.6 Romanians.
Turkish Integration in Romanian Communities

Turkish vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($121,202 compared to $111,243, a difference of 8.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $108,609, a difference of 8.5%), and per capita income ($52,391 compared to $48,445, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.94%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $53,632, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $64,142, a difference of 6.1%).
Turkish vs Romanian Income
Income MetricTurkishRomanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Turkish vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Turkish vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.4%

Turkish vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Turkish vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Turkish vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.92%).
Turkish vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Good
83.0%

Turkish vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.3%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Turkish vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Turkish vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Turkish vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
6.2%

Turkish vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.7%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Turkish vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%

Turkish vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Turkish vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricTurkishRomanian
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%