Bahamian vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bahamians

Romanians

Tragic
Excellent
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Bahamian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,610,918 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to an increase of 52.7 Romanians.
Bahamian Integration in Romanian Communities

Bahamian vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $102,544, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($82,631 compared to $111,243, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,743 compared to $53,632, a difference of 17.2%), median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $41,663, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $64,142, a difference of 25.8%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Income
Income MetricBahamianRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,427
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,631
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,726
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,735
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,756
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,125
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,743
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,395
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,369
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,000
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
28.0%

Bahamian vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 62.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.8%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricBahamianRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
10.4%

Bahamian vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.8%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBahamianRomanian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%

Bahamian vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBahamianRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Good
83.0%

Bahamian vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 46.6%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 41.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBahamianRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.2%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Bahamian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.6%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBahamianRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
6.2%

Bahamian vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricBahamianRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Poor
95.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Bahamian vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Bahamian vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricBahamianRomanian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%