Ecuadorian vs Romanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Romanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Romanians
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Romanian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,192,441 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Romanians.
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 22.0%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $111,243, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $64,142, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,632, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $41,663, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,244, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $48,445 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Exceptional $111,243 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $91,994 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Exceptional $50,244 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Exceptional $60,063 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Exceptional $41,663 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $53,632 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Exceptional $102,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Exceptional $108,609 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Exceptional $64,142 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Tragic 28.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.75%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.9%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Good 83.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 107.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Fair 6.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Exceptional 94.8% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 90.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 62.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 41.6% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Romanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Fair 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |