Portuguese vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Portuguese

Romanians

Average
Excellent
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Portuguese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,264,880 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Romanians.
Portuguese Integration in Romanian Communities

Portuguese vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $48,445, a difference of 9.2%), median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $60,063, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($106,286 compared to $111,243, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $53,632, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $102,544, a difference of 3.1%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Income
Income MetricPortugueseRomanian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,362
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,286
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,976
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,032
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,663
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,177
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,436
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,429
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,309
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,440
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Portuguese vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.93%), male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricPortugueseRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.5%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%

Portuguese vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPortugueseRomanian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%

Portuguese vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.79%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPortugueseRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Good
83.0%

Portuguese vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 17.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.23%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPortugueseRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Portuguese vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.1%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPortugueseRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.6%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Portuguese vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.0%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricPortugueseRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Poor
13.9%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Portuguese vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.5%).
Portuguese vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricPortugueseRomanian
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.5%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%