Choctaw vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,369,245 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Romanians.
Choctaw Integration in Romanian Communities

Choctaw vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $48,445, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $108,609, a difference of 32.0%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $91,994, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,632, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,142, a difference of 20.9%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Income
Income MetricChoctawRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
28.0%

Choctaw vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.3%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.4%

Choctaw vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawRomanian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Choctaw vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Good
83.0%

Choctaw vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Choctaw vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.1%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Choctaw vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.6%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 55.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Choctaw vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.3%).
Choctaw vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawRomanian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Good
2.4%