Burmese vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Romanians

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,097,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 2.9 Romanians.
Burmese Integration in Romanian Communities

Burmese vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $91,994, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $108,609, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $64,142, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.20%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,632, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($52,005 compared to $48,445, a difference of 7.3%).
Burmese vs Romanian Income
Income MetricBurmeseRomanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Burmese vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.8%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.91%).
Burmese vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
10.4%

Burmese vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Burmese vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Burmese vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Burmese vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Good
83.0%

Burmese vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.8%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Burmese vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseRomanian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Burmese vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Burmese vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
6.2%

Burmese vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
Burmese vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Burmese vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Burmese vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseRomanian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
2.4%