Chickasaw vs Romanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Romanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Romanians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Romanian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,006,730 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Romanians.
Chickasaw vs Romanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,445, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,609, a difference of 32.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $102,544, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,142, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,632, a difference of 19.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $48,445 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $111,243 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $91,994 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $50,244 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $60,063 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,663 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,632 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $102,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $108,609 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $64,142 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.5%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.90%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Fair 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.23%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 57.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 41.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Romanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Romanian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |