Pima vs Romanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,098,553 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 97.4 Romanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,445, a difference of 58.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $108,609, a difference of 48.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,994, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,632, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,663, a difference of 17.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $102,544, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 135.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 125.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 106.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 38.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 49.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 161.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 119.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 96.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 79.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 85.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 79.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 74.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 61.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.3%).