Slavic vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slavs

Romanians

Good
Excellent
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Slavic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,036,027 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to a decrease of 16.9 Romanians.
Slavic Integration in Romanian Communities

Slavic vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $48,445, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $60,063, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($86,398 compared to $91,994, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $64,142, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $41,663, a difference of 5.2%).
Slavic vs Romanian Income
Income MetricSlavicRomanian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,049
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Good
$105,144
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Good
$86,398
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,470
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,390
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,613
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,563
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,377
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,629
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,709
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Slavic vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.32%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.75%).
Slavic vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricSlavicRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.4%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%

Slavic vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%).
Slavic vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlavicRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Slavic vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
Slavic vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlavicRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Good
83.0%

Slavic vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Slavic vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlavicRomanian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
28.7%

Slavic vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Slavic vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlavicRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Slavic vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Slavic vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricSlavicRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.7%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.9%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Slavic vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Slavic vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricSlavicRomanian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Good
2.4%