Houma vs Romanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,239,369 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 181.8 Romanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $108,609, a difference of 50.6%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $91,994, a difference of 47.0%), and per capita income ($32,996 compared to $48,445, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $60,063, a difference of 18.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $53,632, a difference of 20.9%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $50,244, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 87.8%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 79.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 74.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 44.7%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 61.9%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.050%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 138.3%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 119.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 117.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 76.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.5%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%).