Fijian vs Romanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,018,928 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 19.8 Romanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $48,445, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $60,063, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $102,544, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,632, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $64,142, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $41,663, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 80.5%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.71%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.7%).