Mongolian vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Mongolians

Romanians

Good
Excellent
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Mongolian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,071,951 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.167% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 167.1 Romanians.
Mongolian Integration in Romanian Communities

Mongolian vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.0%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $111,243, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $108,609, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $60,063, a difference of 0.48%), per capita income ($49,173 compared to $48,445, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $50,244, a difference of 1.6%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Income
Income MetricMongolianRomanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,173
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,553
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,971
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,038
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,350
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,542
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,540
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,578
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,602
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,326
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Mongolian vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.8%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and poverty (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricMongolianRomanian
Poverty
Average
12.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.4%

Mongolian vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMongolianRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Mongolian vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMongolianRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Good
83.0%

Mongolian vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.3%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.56%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMongolianRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Mongolian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMongolianRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
6.2%

Mongolian vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.1%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricMongolianRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
89.9%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.0%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.0%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.4%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Mongolian vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Mongolian vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricMongolianRomanian
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
2.4%