Arab vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,801,455 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $107,650, a difference of 10.6%), per capita income ($45,662 compared to $49,983, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($88,398 compared to $96,292, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $65,497, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 29.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.4%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%).