Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Navajo
Immigrants from Malaysia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Navajo
Immigrants from Malaysia
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Navajo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,089,758 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $49,983, a difference of 72.2%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $115,880, a difference of 63.2%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $96,292, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $54,179, a difference of 27.8%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $43,835, a difference of 32.7%).
Income Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,031 | Exceptional $49,983 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,989 | Exceptional $115,880 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,159 | Exceptional $96,292 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,999 | Exceptional $52,514 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,098 | Exceptional $62,121 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,046 | Exceptional $43,835 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $42,380 | Exceptional $54,179 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $66,529 | Exceptional $107,650 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,759 | Exceptional $112,796 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $47,722 | Exceptional $65,497 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Fair 26.3% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 130.4%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 122.3%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 47.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 47.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.1%).
Poverty Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Poverty | Tragic 23.1% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 22.3% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 30.3% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.5% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 115.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 111.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 107.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.6% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.1% | Tragic 34.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 64.8% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 73.8% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 88.2%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.3%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.65 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.0% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 44.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 22.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.8% | Tragic 86.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Tragic 52.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 100.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 98.8%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.5% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Exceptional 69.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.8% | Exceptional 64.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 52.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 45.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Navajo vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 69.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.9%).
Disability Metric | Navajo | Immigrants from Malaysia |
Disability | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.3% | Exceptional 46.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |