Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,937,859 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($83,319 compared to $115,880, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $112,796, a difference of 36.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $65,497, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $54,179, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $43,835, a difference of 20.4%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $52,514, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 89.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 48.0%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 45.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 44.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 100.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 61.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%), 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.2%).