Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,738,264 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $49,983, a difference of 32.6%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $115,880, a difference of 31.6%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $62,121, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $54,179, a difference of 11.4%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $43,835, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 64.6%), married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.3%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and single female poverty (25.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 50.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 42.4%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 33.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 67.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 57.3%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.6%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.1%).