Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,814,403 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 205.6 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $107,650, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $115,880, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $62,121, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $54,179, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $43,835, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.98%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.24%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.090%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.89%).