Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from Malaysia

Average
Good
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,484,416 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 29.4 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $62,121, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $49,983, a difference of 23.9%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $52,514, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $54,179, a difference of 0.87%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $107,650, a difference of 10.1%), and wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.1%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$49,983
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$115,880
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$96,292
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$52,514
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$62,121
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$43,835
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$54,179
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$107,650
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$112,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$65,497
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Fair
26.3%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 51.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 30.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.71%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Good
12.0%
Families
Good
8.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Good
11.0%
Females
Good
13.1%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 171.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 80.1%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Exceptional
83.2%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 54.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.3%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.84%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
27.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 58.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 82.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 79.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
64.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 119.6%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 71.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.97%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.6%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Malaysia
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%