Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Malaysia

Poor
Good
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,182,772 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.328% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 327.8 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $49,983, a difference of 51.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $107,650, a difference of 41.2%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $115,880, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $54,179, a difference of 0.26%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $65,497, a difference of 16.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$49,983
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Exceptional
$115,880
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$96,292
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Exceptional
$52,514
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Exceptional
$62,121
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Exceptional
$43,835
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Exceptional
$54,179
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Exceptional
$107,650
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Exceptional
$112,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Exceptional
$65,497
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Fair
26.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 106.4%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 74.2%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and single male poverty (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 33.0%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
10.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 134.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 92.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 89.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.0%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 104.7%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 48.7%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.4%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.22, a difference of 7.0%), and currently married (44.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
27.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 119.1%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 105.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 69.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 99.8%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 85.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
64.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.4%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Malaysia
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%