Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Malaysia

Excellent
Good
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,347,832 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.795. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.427% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 426.9 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.7%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $49,983, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $65,497, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $62,121, a difference of 0.15%), median family income ($116,165 compared to $115,880, a difference of 0.25%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $52,514, a difference of 0.29%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Exceptional
$49,983
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Exceptional
$115,880
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Exceptional
$96,292
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Exceptional
$52,514
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Exceptional
$62,121
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Exceptional
$43,835
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Exceptional
$54,179
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Exceptional
$107,650
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Exceptional
$112,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Exceptional
$65,497
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
26.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.2%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.24%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.55%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
27.4%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.6% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 0.34%), college, 1 year or more (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Exceptional
64.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Malaysia
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%