Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Malaysia

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,749,564 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.818. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 97.6 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,983, a difference of 63.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $112,796, a difference of 53.7%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $96,292, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,835, a difference of 24.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 24.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$49,983
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$115,880
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$96,292
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$52,514
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$62,121
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$43,835
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,179
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$107,650
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$112,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Exceptional
$65,497
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Fair
26.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 121.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 117.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 104.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
10.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 171.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 133.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 130.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.2%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 104.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 88.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.22, a difference of 16.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
27.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 94.4%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 94.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.26%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
64.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 80.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 72.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 20.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Malaysia
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%