Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,066,329 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $107,650, a difference of 33.1%), per capita income ($38,165 compared to $49,983, a difference of 31.0%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $96,292, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $54,179, a difference of 12.9%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $43,835, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $65,497, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 45.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 53.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 37.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 66.5%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.0%).