Latvian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,714,403 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 57.4 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.0%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $49,983, a difference of 5.3%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $115,880, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $43,835, a difference of 0.24%), median earnings ($53,001 compared to $52,514, a difference of 0.93%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $96,292, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 38.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.7%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.9%).