Crow vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,149,870 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.501. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 45.2 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,983, a difference of 57.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $112,796, a difference of 51.9%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $115,880, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,179, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,835, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $65,497, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 99.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.7%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 94.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 29.2%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 262.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 234.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 232.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.9%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 47.5%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 80.9%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 77.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.53%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 52.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 49.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.8%).