Slavic vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,512,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 22.6 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $107,650, a difference of 11.7%), median household income ($86,398 compared to $96,292, a difference of 11.5%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $49,983, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $65,497, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $54,179, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.7%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.5%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 51.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.3%).