Russian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,627,450 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.5%), per capita income ($53,154 compared to $49,983, a difference of 6.4%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $115,880, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $54,179, a difference of 0.39%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $43,835, a difference of 0.76%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $52,514, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.0%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and male poverty (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.1%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.93%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.2%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.3%).