Czech vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,818,109 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $43,835, a difference of 12.4%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $49,983, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $96,292, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,179, a difference of 5.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $65,497, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $112,796, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 97.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.4%).