Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,335,276 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 62.2 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $49,983, a difference of 14.8%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $62,121, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($127,430 compared to $115,880, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $54,179, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $65,497, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($46,902 compared to $43,835, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.53%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.20%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.5%), master's degree (22.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.4%).