French American Indian vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,504,495 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.387% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 387.3 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 13.7%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $39,894, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $58,624, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $87,760, a difference of 2.2%), per capita income ($40,244 compared to $41,131, a difference of 2.2%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $51,836, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (24.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.0%), single male poverty (15.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.95%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.2%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 59.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.3%), master's degree (12.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 5.3%).