Immigrants from Iran vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,188,573 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to an increase of 21.5 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,759 compared to $41,131, a difference of 40.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,204 compared to $87,760, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($130,894 compared to $96,544, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $51,333, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($47,154 compared to $39,894, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($57,612 compared to $45,641, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 54.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.2%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 66.1%), births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 44.1%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 98.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 80.2%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.7%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%).