Latvian vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,311,043 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 61.0 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,131, a difference of 28.0%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $96,544, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,333, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,894, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,624, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.8%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 53.3%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 69.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.0%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%).