Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Ghana
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Ghana
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,105,696 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 39.4 Immigrants from Ghana.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $81,489, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,894, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,836, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,624, a difference of 9.1%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,641, a difference of 12.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $41,131 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $96,544 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $81,489 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,641 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $51,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $39,894 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,333 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $87,760 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $94,982 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,624 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.4%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 82.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 111.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 16.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 83.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 47.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 57.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 44.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 36.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 15.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ghana |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Poor 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |