Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,704,887 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $87,760, a difference of 8.8%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $51,836, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $39,894, a difference of 0.27%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $41,131, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($47,304 compared to $45,641, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.0%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.1%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.0%).