Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,504,615 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 15.6 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $87,760, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($99,840 compared to $96,544, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,598 compared to $45,641, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $51,333, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $51,836, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.4%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and family households (63.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 74.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (94.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.0%), male disability (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.78%).