Slavic vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,118,080 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $87,760, a difference of 9.8%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $41,131, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $39,894, a difference of 0.71%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $51,333, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($47,470 compared to $45,641, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.69%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.4%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.1%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 85.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.79%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%).