Pima vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,929,080 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,131, a difference of 34.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $94,982, a difference of 29.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $81,489, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,333, a difference of 0.33%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $87,760, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 92.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 71.8%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 117.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 98.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 49.1%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 62.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 59.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 57.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.4%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.5%).