Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,096,789 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $58,624, a difference of 31.0%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $96,544, a difference of 23.4%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $39,894, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $51,333, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $87,760, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.8%), births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.72%), currently married (43.7% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 90.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.9%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.060%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.42%).