Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,525,434 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 54.9 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $51,333, a difference of 4.4%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $41,131, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($96,439 compared to $96,544, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,804 compared to $94,982, a difference of 0.19%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $81,489, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.2% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.4%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.88%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 40.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and college, under 1 year (63.7% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 4th grade (97.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.9%), female disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.71%).