Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,402,810 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 28.8 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $41,131, a difference of 39.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $87,760, a difference of 33.6%), and median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $51,836, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $51,333, a difference of 8.9%), median female earnings ($46,902 compared to $39,894, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $58,624, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.79%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 58.8%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.2%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 93.2%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.8%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%).