Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,785,324 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 11.5 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $41,131, a difference of 40.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $87,760, a difference of 32.1%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $96,544, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $51,333, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($46,573 compared to $39,894, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $58,624, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.2%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 56.8%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 69.9%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.9%).