Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Ghana

Poor
Poor
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,545,127 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Immigrants from Ghana.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $41,131, a difference of 41.7%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $81,489, a difference of 37.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $94,982, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.22%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $39,894, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $51,333, a difference of 21.1%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.3%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 100.1%), single male poverty (25.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 89.4%), and single father poverty (29.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 36.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 72.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.8%), female unemployment (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
6.2%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
82.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 49.2%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.29, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (40.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (66.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
34.5%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 76.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
5.2%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 59.0%), bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 56.4%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.3%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.5%