Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,700,293 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,401 compared to $87,760, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $94,982, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($122,800 compared to $96,544, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $51,333, a difference of 8.5%), median female earnings ($44,847 compared to $39,894, a difference of 12.4%), and median earnings ($54,530 compared to $45,641, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.8%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 51.0%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (66.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 73.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 31.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%).