Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,261,978 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.091% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 90.6 Immigrants from Ghana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $87,760, a difference of 22.4%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $41,131, a difference of 22.3%), and median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $51,836, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $58,624, a difference of 6.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $51,333, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $39,894, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.3%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.5%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.44%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 36.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.4%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%).