Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,670,300 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $42,950, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $90,372, a difference of 24.2%), and median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $53,457, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $50,609, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $40,257, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $59,837, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 42.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.5%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.6%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.8%).