Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,845,031 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 13.8 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $59,837, a difference of 33.8%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $100,256, a difference of 28.1%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $42,950, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $50,609, a difference of 0.47%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $90,372, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 63.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 54.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 25.6%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (43.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 43.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.1%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 44.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.83%).