Latvian vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,298,612 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.816. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.261% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,261.4 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,950, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $90,372, a difference of 20.5%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,609, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,257, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $59,837, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.1%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.0%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.27%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.0%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%).