Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,574,996 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Ethiopia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.832. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.996% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ethiopia corresponds to an increase of 995.7 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,238 compared to $59,837, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (21.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and per capita income ($45,923 compared to $42,950, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,434 compared to $53,457, a difference of 3.7%), median earnings ($48,924 compared to $46,564, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,256 compared to $90,372, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.3%), single father poverty (13.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households (61.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.11%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.5%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).