Laotian vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,990,865 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 31.1 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $90,372, a difference of 16.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $97,284, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($94,990 compared to $83,289, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $40,257, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $50,609, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $46,564, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (65.8% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.23%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%).